Monday 8 March 2021

Stacey Slater Gets Sectioned: EastEnders and the Mental Health Act

 

Assessments under the Mental Health Act are rarely, if ever, depicted in TV drama. And because of the logistical difficulties involving consent and privacy, I have never seen a full real life assessment on TV.

The closest was in an episode of the Channel 4 series Bedlam, which followed Jim Thirkle, an AMHP, as he attempted to assess a patient, Rosemary. Sadly, the camera was unable to follow him and the psychiatrist as they entered her home, so the only way you’ll know what happens during a MHA assessment is by following my YouTube channel or reading the Masked AMHP blog.

Back in 2009 there was an Eastenders storyline featuring a character called Stacey Slater, played by the actor Lacey Turner. According to Wikipedia, she was given a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, and apparently the programme worked with various charities to develop the story. The storyline culminated in her being assessed under the Mental Health Act and detained under section 2.

We know it was section 2 because her cool young GP, Dr Al Jenkins, says so during the scene.

So, is this particular scene an accurate portrayal of the MHA assessment process?

I’m going to show you the scene, but before I do I’ll describe who is in it.

Stacey enters the living room.

There is a female police officer, Stacey’s mother and her GP, Dr “Call me Al” Jenkins standing. A bearded man and a black woman are seen sitting very quietly on the sofa. They are introduced as Dr Warder and Mrs Cook, who can “help assess your condition”.

A rather surly and threatening male cop appears at the doorway.

See if you can work out what might be wrong.

*

So what exactly is wrong with this scene? Let me count the ways.

1. In real life, it’s hard enough to get a patient’s GP to attend an assessment. When they do, they tend to know very little about the MHA, and take a back seat. They never lead the assessment.

2. Unless the powers under section 135 are being used, it is even more difficult to get the police to attend, and certainly not before an assessment has been completed.

3. The AMHP has responsibility for leading an assessment, and makes the final decision, having interviewed the patient in a suitable manner, and taking into account all the circumstances of the case.

4. Who even is the AMHP in this scene? By process of elimination it can only be the black woman on the sofa, Mrs Cook, who says precisely nothing. In real life the AMHP would lead, and begin by introducing all the members of the assessment team, and stating clearly the reason for the assessment.

5. In real life the AMHP and the psychiatrist would ask the patient questions, and attempt to ascertain evidence of active mental disorder. There would then be a private discussion, and a final decision would be made as to whether or not the patient was suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or degree sufficient to justify their detention in hospital for assessment. But I guess that would be a bit difficult to fit into a scene lasting less than 3 minutes.

6. It very quickly becomes clear that the decision has already been made. After Dr Jenkins tell poor Stacey that “we think you should go to hospital”, he very quickly concludes that “we’re all agreed it’s for your own safety”.

7. As there’s no sign of any pink forms, it’s clear that the section papers have been completed before the psychiatrist and the AMHP have even set eyes on Stacey.

8. Dr Jenkins tells Stacey that “there’s a car outside”. What sort of car? An Uber? In reality, an ambulance would be required, which would then probably take at least a couple of hours to arrive.

9. Apart from looking intimidating, the male cop appears to have had no control and restraint training. Not only does he not quickly disarm Stacey, who is brandishing a very dangerous plugged in table lamp (surely a first for an offensive weapon), but he allows her to escape into the Square.

I’d be interested to know who advised the story editors on the protocols of an assessment under the Mental Health Act. It certainly wasn’t an AMHP.

No comments:

Post a Comment