It’s hard to know where to start in a
dissection of this report.
That huge red number is clearly intended to
alarm. One has to conclude that the Sun wishes to suggest that its readers are
all at risk of being murdered in their beds by homicidal maniacs.
The Sun’s use of the term “mental patients”
is not only deliberate use of a term with pejorative implications, but also
implies that there are two sorts of people: “normal” people (Sun readers
perhaps?) and “mental” people, people who are unpredictable and potentially
dangerous.
Having emblazoned its front page with this
frightening statement, the Sun’s “full story” is buried on pages 6 and 7. It
begins: “A Sun investigation today reveals disturbing failings in Britain ’s
mental health system that have allowed high-risk patients to kill 1,200 in a
decade.”
The article is fringed by 12 brief accounts
of people who have been murdered by “mental patients” over the last few years.
So where did the Sun obtain these figures?
It mentions “a Manchester
University study”. This
can only be the Annual Report The National Confidential Inquiry into Suicideand Homicide by People with Mental Illness, published by the University of
Manchester in July
2013.
The Sun’s “probe” (their word), must have
taken all of 30 seconds before finding this study, which was published 3 months
previously in July. Community Care published a thoughtful article back on 5thJuly 2013, headlining their article with a quote from the Report saying: “The
number of homicides committed by mental health patients has fallen ‘to its
lowest level for a decade’.” The writer of this report, Julian Hendy, goes on
to express skepticism of some of the figures.
The Sun reports that 122 people a year on
average were killed by “mental patients”. This would appear to have been lifted
from Community Care’s article.
The Sun goes on to lay the blame for these
figures on “the slashing of budgets for mental health care”. They quote
Marjorie Wallace of SANE as saying that “homicide figures may not have
increased in decades – but significantly they have not declined either.”
So what does the University of Manchester
report actually say?
Right at the beginning of the report, it is
stated: “Homicide by mental health patients has fallen substantially since a
peak in 2006, and the figures for the most recent confirmed years, 2009-2010,
are the lowest since we began data collection in 1997”.
Although the report acknowledges that some of its statistics may be
incomplete, it does say “it is likely that this is a true fall in patient
homicide”.
Already, this seems to be factually at odds with the Sun’s report.
While I do not wish to minimise the potential effects of recent cutbacks to
spending on mental health, in this case, recent changes in mental health
legislation and delivery are given as a possible explanation for this
reduction, citing the use of CTO’s as a potential factor.
Another failing of the Sun’s “probe” is to
place these figures in any sort of context. The Office of National Statistics
provides illuminating statistics for overall numbers of homicides.
It gives statistics going back to 1960 for homicides initially recorded by the police. The long term graph shows a gradual increase in homicides from 282 in 1960 to a peak of 1047 in 2002-3. Since then, there has been a steep fall to around half of that peak.
Taking the ONS statistics, it can be seen
that during the 10 year period from 2001-2011 on which the Sun bases its
figures, there were a total of 7926 homicides. This compares with the figure of
1220 homicides committed by mental health patients quoted by the Sun and Julian
Hendy. In other words, a little over 15% of homicides were committed by people
who were known patients of mental health services. To put it another way, 85%
of murders were committed by people who weren’t “mental patients”.
But I suppose the headline: “You’re 6 times
more likely to be killed by a “normal” person than someone with mental health problems”
doesn’t have quite the same ring to it.
applauds heartily
ReplyDeleteIt will be interesting to see where they go with this. It's hardly an expose by the Sunday Times Insight Team, is it? However, if the editor has a mind to persevere, a month's worth of dilatory reporting of debateable statistics with Sun-speak headlines could change attitudes to people with mental health issues in a serious and negative manner. 'Mental patients' can go along with 'scroungers' and 'bogus asylum seekers' as our national devils.
ReplyDeleteDid you ask the Sun for the right to reply on behalf of the 'libelled' masses of 'mental patients'?
ReplyDelete