tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post6648287552431076554..comments2024-03-27T17:57:42.627+00:00Comments on The Masked AMHP: Rectifiable and Non-rectifiable Errors and Other MisdemeanoursThe Masked AMHPhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01348865658320780867noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-6170876915646964282023-11-22T20:36:28.227+00:002023-11-22T20:36:28.227+00:00Has any one had any history of when the A6 form in...Has any one had any history of when the A6 form in respect of S.3 has not been filled out and no justification as to why(relating to NR consultation) when in reality the NR consultation did take place? <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-43994574337347888322015-03-21T09:51:06.465+00:002015-03-21T09:51:06.465+00:00I tend to concentrate on the forms that I'm re...I tend to concentrate on the forms that I'm responsible for as an AMHP, ie. applications and medical recommendations. There are some arcane issues relating to hospital forms which only MHA administrators are likely to know the answers to.The Masked AMHPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01348865658320780867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-42632718054009500132015-03-18T12:54:50.956+00:002015-03-18T12:54:50.956+00:00Has anyone responded to this?Has anyone responded to this?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-8634205333754733592015-02-13T14:31:35.035+00:002015-02-13T14:31:35.035+00:00... on the H5.... on the H5.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-71682324697068280382015-02-13T14:30:17.896+00:002015-02-13T14:30:17.896+00:00Thanks for this. I'm interested in what might...Thanks for this. I'm interested in what might fall into CQC's third category - i.e. mistakes that don't even need rectification. Is there any guidance on this? Do you think it would include entering the wrong date for when an authority is due to expire if (1) the date of examination is correct (2) the date of the form is correct (3) the dates of both are within the correct Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-35593106530868312342015-01-01T15:43:09.196+00:002015-01-01T15:43:09.196+00:00Yes, as it is the wording of the form which is imp...Yes, as it is the wording of the form which is important. The NR would have to be saying that they are approved, when they cannot be. They would have to complete Form 5.The Masked AMHPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01348865658320780867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-53150180155883256212015-01-01T10:28:08.182+00:002015-01-01T10:28:08.182+00:00Hi Masked Amhp, with regard to signing forms etc. ...Hi Masked Amhp, with regard to signing forms etc. would you say that, for instance, a statutory Form A6 (application by AMHP) that is actually signed by the Nearest Relative would then prove to be invalid?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-7102187859305069002013-02-14T13:49:34.021+00:002013-02-14T13:49:34.021+00:00Our MHA Administrator is still not aware of this, ...Our MHA Administrator is still not aware of this, and demands fresh assessments.<br />The Masked AMHPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01348865658320780867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-78454530968452288952013-02-14T13:38:05.487+00:002013-02-14T13:38:05.487+00:00"But they can be bigger errors, such as two d..."But they can be bigger errors, such as two doctors from the same clinical team providing recommendations. As long as you get another medical recommendation within 14 days, you’re all right."<br /><br />Nothing wrong with two doctors from the same team. The CQC guidance on this was wrong and has recently been rectified.Guynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-9776308448661985972012-02-17T20:01:52.789+00:002012-02-17T20:01:52.789+00:00This must be something that occurs from time. It m...This must be something that occurs from time. It may be dealt with internally, but I imagine it would be kept quiet, otherwise the local authority ought really to inform all the patients that AMHP has detained while practicing unlawfully. There was a fairly recent case of a social worker who was struck off the GSCC register for continuing to practice as an AMHP after omitting to be reapproved. ItThe Masked AMHPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01348865658320780867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-47115489669987299362012-02-17T19:46:02.431+00:002012-02-17T19:46:02.431+00:00Nice summary. But what about the AMHP who continu...Nice summary. But what about the AMHP who continues to complete applications but who cannot evidence 18 hours of refresher training in a particular year of approval. Unlawful? Any thoughts?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-380213133018137281.post-85113981532492533262012-02-01T23:58:30.119+00:002012-02-01T23:58:30.119+00:00Brilliant! Especially the exclamation marks :)Brilliant! Especially the exclamation marks :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com